The Language of a Generation vs “Funny” Picture: Students’ Perceptions of Memes in Digital Culture

  • Andrii Borets Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University
  • Volodymyr Hrysiuk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: memes, digital culture, humor, student audience, social communications

Abstract

The article examines how students perceive the phenomenon of Internet memes and assess their cultural and communicative potential. The relevance of the topic is due to the growing role of digital humour in shaping public narratives and its transition from the everyday sphere to the academic one. Memes are increasingly becoming the subject of interdisciplinary research covering communicative, psychological, political, and educational dimensions. In Ukrainian context, interest in memes intensified after the start of full-scale war, when they became a means of mobilization, self-identification and overcoming fear. A review of publications from the last decade confirms the scientific legitimacy of memes as a subject of research. The aim of this article is to identify students’ perceptions of memes as an element of digital culture and to define the boundaries between their ‘everyday’ and ‘academic’ understanding. The empirical basis for the study was a survey of 86 students at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, conducted before the start of the course ‘Symbolic Communications: Memes, Emojis and GIF Culture.’ The questionnaire contained 12 questions — mostly closed-ended, as well as several open-ended questions for recording individual comments. The results showed that students primarily view memes as the “language of a generation” (43 %), but at the same time, a significant portion perceive them as “jokes circulating on the internet” (38 %) or simply “cool pictures” (14 %). Over 70 % of respondents use memes, emojis or stickers every day, but only 15 % identify themselves as active content creators. Most recognise the scientific potential of memes (61 %) and consider them relevant to education, albeit with a degree of self-irony. The most common taboo topics are war, religion, disease and violence. The findings confirm that for students, memes are simultaneously a means of self-expression, an educational resource and a social marker of digital culture, combining the serious and the ironic, the personal and the collective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrii Borets, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University

PhD in Social Communications,
Associate Professor at the Department of Journalism and New Media,
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University

Volodymyr Hrysiuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD in Journalism,
Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Film and Television Arts,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

References

Bandy, J. (2025). Internet Memes (syllabus). https://www.jackbandy.com/internet-memes-syllabus/

Bayerl, P. S., & Stoynov, L. (2016). Revenge by Photoshop: Memefying police acts in the public dialogue about injustice. New Media & Society, 18(6), 1006–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554747

Deane, J. (2025). Memes: Media, genres, applications (syllabus). New Jersey Institute of Technology, HSS-404. https://archives.njit.edu/vhlib/syllabi/hum/HSS-404-058-060-2025-Spring-Deane.pdf

Highfield, T. (2017). Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Kreps, S., Lushenko, P., & Carter, K. (2023, February 10). Lessons from the Meme War in Ukraine. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/lessons-from-the-meme-war-in-ukraine/

Kuipers, G. (2011). Good Humor, Bad Taste: A sociology of the joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kuznietsova, T. (2024). Mem yak komunikatyvnyi pryiom podolannia strakhu pid chas viiny: Ukrainskyi kontekst [Memes as a Communicative Technique of Overcoming Fear in Waetime: Ukrainian context]. Integrated Communications, 1(17), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-2644.2024.172 [in Ukrainian]

Liagusha, A. (2025). Memes, Freedom, and Resilience to Information Disorders. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1, Article 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101247

Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (2019). Beyond a Joke: The limits of humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Bilgihan, A., Sinha, P., & Tikoo, T. (2022). Meme Marketing: How can marketers drive better engagement using viral memes? Psychology & Marketing, 39(9), 1775–1801. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21702

MEME WARS: Folk humor strikes back. (n.d.). [Documentary film]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm57Kyxf7L0

Milner, R. M. (2016). The World Made Meme: Public conversations and participatory media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Razzaq, A., Shao, W., & Quach, S. (2024). Prominent Versus Subtle Meme Marketing: The role of narrative transportation, brand knowledge, and meme literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, Article 108043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108043

Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2017). Digital Cultures of Political Participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimisation of the 2016 US presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Discourse, Context & Media, 16, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tilton, S. (2025). Memetic Communication (syllabus). https://shanetilton.com/memetic-communication-syllabus/

University of California, San Diego. (n.d.). Linguistics of the Internet (LIGN 42). https://wstyler.ucsd.edu/42/

Valensise, C. M., Serra, A., Galeazzi, A., Etta, G., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021). Entropy and Complexity Unveil the Landscape of Memes Evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(41), Article e2026045118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026045118


Abstract views: 0
Downloads of PDF: 0
Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Borets, A., & Hrysiuk, V. (2025). The Language of a Generation vs “Funny” Picture: Students’ Perceptions of Memes in Digital Culture. Integrated Communications, (2(20), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.28925/2524-2652.2025.218