Distance Lexicographic Discourse: Media Platforms Of Communicative Interaction
Abstract
The article highlights the problem field of remote lexicographic discourse, the parameters of the vectors of iits description and typological varieties with regard to the terminographic aspect. This problem still does not have relevant coverage in the scientific literature, which gives every reason to propose the author’s own vision of it. The use of the method of problem analysis made it possible to outline the following parameters of the description of remote lexicographic discourse: subject of communication; participants (subjects), channels, vectors of communicative interaction (discursive vectors) and means of communication. System analysis and the method of going from the abstract to the specific made it possible to distinguish in a remote format: on the one hand, intracultural, intercultural (intercultural), transcultural and multicultural lexicographic discourses; on the other – dictionary discourse, dictionary article discourse, terminological and terminographic discourses and lexicographic discourse of terminological schools. Content analysis and the descriptive method highlighted the correlations between the varieties of remote lexicographic discourse and the media platforms of communicative interaction representing them. The use of methods of observation, lexicographic, comparative, systematic analysis and the method of analysis of dictionary definitions made it possible to identify, in accordance with three classification criteria (addressee, communication channel and relation to ethnoculture): the main varieties of lexicographic discourse; a list for each variety with the corresponding platform of mediated (remote) communicative interaction. It has been established that varieties of lexicographic discourse are correlated between the major vectors of communicative interaction. Such a correlation helps to find out on specific examples which media platforms of mediated (distance) communicative interaction as mediators can be used in one or another variety. It is noted that the communicative interaction in the lexicographic discourse involves not only the transfer of information in the format of a dictionary (text), but also the exchange of information about the dictionary in its various forms, including remote.
Downloads
References
Bessé, B., Nkwenti-Azeh, B. & Sager, J. (1997). Glossary of terms used in terminology. Terminology, Vol. 4(1), pp. 119–156.
Bilodid, I. K. (Ed), (1978). Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. Naukova dumka, 9.
Bodeker, B. & Freese, K. (1987). Die Ubersetzung von Realienbezeichnungen bei literarischen Texten: Eine Prototypologie. TEXTconTEXT, Vol. 2–2(3), pp. 137–165.
Boiarova, L. G. (2013). Terminy-varianty v ukrainskii zahalnomovnii leksykohrafii: normatyvnii aspekt [Termsvariants in the Ukrainian universal lexicography: normative aspect]. Terminolohichnyi Visnyk [Terminological Bulletin], Vol. 2(1), pp. 189–195.
Bystrova, Yu. V. (2019). IKT open science – nova paradyhma vidkrytukh innovatdii [ICT open science is a new
paradigm of open innovation]. In S.V. Hlibko, A.M. Liubchych & O.Yu. Palant (Eds.), Rehionalni innovatsiini initsiatyvy: zavdannia ta shliakhy vyrishennia [Regional innovation initiatives: tasks and solutions] (pp. 29–36). NDI PZIR NAPrN Ukraine. Aviable at: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/16319/1/Bustrova_29-36.pdf (accessed 10.12.23).
DSTU 1.1:2015 (2015). Natsionalna standartyzatsia. Standartyzatsia ta sumizhni vydy diialnosti. Slovnyk terminiv [National standardization. Standardization and related activities. Dictionary of terms]. UkrNDNC. URL: Aviable at: https://quality.nuph.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/dstu_1_1_2015.pdf (accessed 10.12.23).
Fedoriv, M. L. (2003). Pro osoblyvosti kompiuternoho dyskursu [About the peculiarities of computer discourse]. Naukovi zapusky [Proceedings], Vol. 22(1), pp. 32–42.
HRN EN 45020:2007 (2007). Normizacija i srodne djelatnosti – Rječnik općih naziva. Zagreb.
ISO 1087:2019(en) (2019). Terminology work and terminology science – Vocabulary. Aviable at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:1087:ed-2:v1:en (accessed 10.12.23).
ISO 25964-1:2011(en) (2011). Information and documentation – Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies – Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. Aviable at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:25964:-1:ed-1:v1:en (accessed 10.12.23).
ISO 29383:2020(en) (2020). Terminology policies – Development and implementation. Aviable at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:29383:ed-2:v1:en (accessed 10.12.23).
Ivashchenko, V. (2014). Osnivni napriamy doslidzhen’ u terminoznavstvi kintsia XX – pochatku XXI stolit’ [The main directions of research in terminology of the late 20th – early 21st centuries]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekcnika». Seria «Problemy ukrainskoi terminolohii» [Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series «Problems of Ukrainian Terminology»], Vol. 791, pp. 22–26.
Ivashchenko, V., Horbenko, G., & Hidenko, S. (2020). Terminohrafichna baza danukh TERM_IN u mizhslovianskomu dialozi: arkhitektonika ta proiektuvannia [Terminographic database TERM_IN in inter-Slavic dialogue: architectonics and design]. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, Vol. 46(2), pp. 669–691.
Krempova, M. (2020). Slovnukovyi dyskurs yak fenomen suchasnoho komunikatyvnoho seredovyshcha [Dictionary discourse as a phenomenon of the modern communicative environment]. In Problemy ta perspektyvy realizatsii ta vprovadzhennia mizhdystsiplinarnykh naukovykh dosiahnen’ [Problems and prospects of implementation and implementation of interdisciplinary scientific achievements], 1 (pp. 112–114). International Center for Scientific Research. Aviable at: https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/mcnd/issue/view/12.06.2020/320 (accessed 10.12.23).
Kroupová, L. & Filipec, J. (2005). Slovník spisovné češtiny pro školu a veřejnost: s Dodatkem Ministerstva školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy České republiky. Academia.
Kyiak, T. R. (2013). Terminolohichna norma (sut’, realii, prahmatyka) [Terminological norm (essence, realities, pragmatics)]. Ukrainska terminolohia i suchasnist’ [Ukrainian terminology and modernity], Vol. IX, pp.42–47.
LexMeet. ELEXIS. Aviable at: https://meet.elex.is/groups/lexvoc-translation/forum/topic/general considerationsand-translation-guidelines/ (accessed 10.12.23).
Lukszyn, J. (Ed) (2005). Języki specjalistyczne – słownik terminologii przedmiotowej. KJS.
Petráčková, V. & Kraus, J. (2001). Akademický slovník cizích slov. Academia.
Velyka, I. O. & Tupakhina, O. V. (2017). Fenomen «Internet-dyskurs» u suchasnii naukovii paradyhmi [The phenomenon of «Internet discourse» in the modern scientific paradigm]. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, Vol. 39(143), pp. 61–64.
Vovk, M. & Mashkova, I. (2018, June 21–21). Ukrainoznavcha osvita v Ukraini i Kanadi u leksykohrafichnomu dyskursi. Ukraina – Kanada [Ukrainian studies education in Ukraine and Canada in lexicographic discourse. Ukraine – Canada] [Conference session]. Materials of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Congress on Canadian Studies. Lutsk, Ukraine, pp. 271–275.
Yermolenko, S. Ya., Bybyk, S. P. & Todor, O. H. (2001). Ukrainska mova. Korotkyi tlumachnyi slovnyk linhvistychnykh terminiv [Ukrainian language. A brief explanatory dictionary of linguistic terms]. Lybid.
Zrazhevska, N. I. (2022). Teoria media ta suspilstva: navch. posib. Kyiv: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 2022. 198 p.
