Principles of cross-media in political journalism
Abstract
The article examines the perspectives of cross-media in the field of political journalism and positioning of relevant publications in the modern media. It focuses on the psychological aspects of perception of materials of political journalism by the readership. The basic description of media tools for improving journalistic publications of political content is represented. In the sphere of political information the transition from traditional to the newest forms of information exchange, in which communications, based on technological mechanisms, become the priority. In different countries of the world, the information environment is modified in terms of new technologies, which are gradually moving into the Ukrainian information space. In journalism it is traced factually the transition into cross-media age. In the article, except the general definition of cross media as “the ability to distribute information in convincing, user-friendly and visually understandable form with various communication tools and platforms”, an alternative definition is proposed for a better understanding of this information phenomenon. The need for cross-media research in the field of political journalism is related to the general reformation of the Ukrainian information space into a cross-media version. The results of the study can be used in the form of addendum to journalist lectures in educational institutions, as well as as practical application in the work of young journalists, advertisers and publishers.
Downloads
References
Behmer, M. & Müller, H. (2013), “Warum crossmedial arbeiten?”, Innovation in den Medien, Verlag Dr. Gabriele Hooffacker, Munich, pp. 24–39.
Brüggemann, M. (2004), “Jetzt erst recht: Crossmediale Strategies for journalistic qualitative verbs”, Gute Seiten – Schlechte Seiten: Qualität in der Onlinekommunikation, Reinhard Fischer, Munich, pp. 222–233.
Hohlfeld, R., Müller, P., Richter, A. & Zacher, F. (Hrsg.) (2010), “Publizistische Qualität in neuen Öffentlichkeiten”, Crossmedia. Wer Bleibt Auf der Strecke?, Lit., Berlin, pp. 20–36.
Köhler-Noak, C. (2011), “Entwicklung von Crossmedia in Deutschland”, Marketing-Börse, available at: http://www. marketing-boerse.de/Fachartikel/details/Entwicklung-von-Crossmedia-in-Deutschland/31861 (accessed: 2018).
Luzan, A. (2011), “Political sphere”, Political Encyclopedia, in Levenets, Yu. & Shapoval, Yu. (Eds.), Parliamentary Publishing House, Kyiv.
Beletska, A. (2016), “Relevance of the research of mass emotions in social communications for comprehension of mass information product as the unity of mass information, mass interpretation and massive emotions”, Naukovi Zapysky Instytutu Zhurnalistyky [Scientific Notes of Institute of Journalism], no. 21.
Vladymyrov, V. (2003), Journalism, Person, Society: a Problem of Understanding, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, 210 p.
Zemlyanova, L. M. (2010), “Discussing the problems of social responsibility of mass media in contemporary foreign communicativistics”, Electronic Journal “Mediascope”, Moscow State University, available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/?q=node/659 (accessed: 2018).
Ivanov, D. (2004), “Society as a virtual reality”, Informacionnoe Obshhestvo [Information Society], OOO “Izd-vo AST”.
Ivanov, V. (2010), The General Theories of Mass Communication and Journalism: a Textbook, in Rizun, V. V. (Ed.), Tsentr Vilnoi Presy, Akademiia Ukrainskoi Presy, 257 p.
Noel-Neuman, E. (2007), “Public opinion”, Social and Political Journalism. Mass Communication: Media Encyclopedia, in Ivanov, V. F. (Ed.), AUP, CVP, Kyiv.
Pocheptsov, G. G. (1995), Imigemaker Public Relations for Politicians and Businessmen, Kiev.
Radomska, L. A. (2014), “Complex education with a borrowed prepositional component”, Naukovi Zapysky Berdianskoho Natsionalnoho Pedahohichnoho Universytetu [Scientific Notes of Berdyansk National Pedagogical University], no. 4, available at: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2018/12/12/643528/.
Rizun, V. V. (2003), Masses, VPC Kyiv University, Kyiv, 118 p.
Serazhym, K. (2002), Discourse As a Sociolinguistic Phenomenon: Methodology, Architectonics, Variability, Kyiv, 580 p.
